Contact
Professionals arranging connected stages on a process table

Process / Working sequence

From request to review

How the work is arranged and reviewed.

A six-stage sequence for defining responsibilities, preparing outputs, and handling review.

Sequence / Six stages

Each stage ends with a confirmed handover.

The rail below shows the order of stages and the item that passes to the next point. Work moves forward once that item exists.

  1. 01 Define Request in writing
  2. 02 Review Starting point
  3. 03 Arrange Order and owners
  4. 04 Produce Agreed items
  5. 05 Check Against requirements
  6. 06 Continue Close or iterate
01Define

Establish the request

The required service, current materials, responsible contacts, constraints, and expected outputs are identified.

Hands over a written brief

02Review

Inspect the starting point

Websites, accounts, content, campaign information, access, and technical conditions are reviewed where relevant.

Hands over documented findings

03Arrange

Set the working scope

Activities are placed in sequence, dependencies are documented, and review points are assigned to the work.

Hands over an agreed scope

04Produce

Prepare the agreed items

Pages, structures, campaigns, content materials, tracking, or supporting documents are produced within scope.

Hands over prepared drafts

05Check

Review implementation

The prepared work is checked against the agreed requirements, supplied information, and relevant technical states.

Hands over a checked result

06Continue

Close or iterate

The work is handed over, published, or moved into an agreed review cadence where ongoing activity is included.

Returns to stage one when scope grows

Two professionals handing prepared working materials across a dark table

Handover / What moves forward

Every transition carries one defined item.

  • Written briefDefined scope
  • Access and materialsReviewed starting point
  • Agreed scopeProduced pages and campaigns
  • Prepared draftsChecked implementation
  • Checked resultHandover or next cycle

Review points / Keep decisions visible

What is checked before the next step.

Review points depend on the selected services, but the purpose remains the same: confirm information before the next dependent task begins.

Two specialists checking documents and a tablet against a line of review checkpoints
Scope

Does this belong in the work?

Material

Is the required information available?

Implementation

Does the output match the requirement?

Next action

Publish, hand over, or iterate?

Contact / Begin at stage one

Start by describing the work, existing materials, and required services.